What are you afraid of?
I’ve been playing poker since 2012 and I wrote about it last month. This month I will be discussing a game brought by my practice students. Our topic this time will discuss an objective behavior about fear in the game, even though we look right in a game, but we feel we have been taken advantage of by our fear.
The hand that will be discussed is a hold’em game that has $2/$4 blinds. Where both players A is a policeman and B is a criminal who both have $400 in cash
Person A opens the game by raising the bet to $14 and holding cards K(heart) and J(curly) in CO(Cut-off) position . The BTN (Button) position folds, while the SB ( Small-Blind ) position makes a call, and ( Big-Blind ) folds. My student describes the CO position as losing and passive, so the line of reasoning here is probably wider than we would expect to see as a better player.
The laying of the initial three cards by the dealer, namely; J (spade), 2 (spade), and K (curly), provide an opportunity for A to win with 2 pairs. SB makes a check, A makes a bet of $22 to $32, and SB makes a call.
The turn brings the Q card (spades), which allows for Flush and straight cards to appear which makes A to check followed by B. Check is a passive game, I think you can increase the bet number but check also has its own advantages also.
The placing of the last card by the dealer, which is 8(curly) and now the SB position increases the bet from $60 to $76. My student closed the cards, but he showed me the closed cards because he was worried about the folding he was making after showing a little strength.What are you afraid of?
Sometimes players will say that their game is “Represented” in these situations, after all the matches that have been done so far raise the stakes to a higher level, and then make a check. how can Daftar Akun Judi Bola B expect to have a good card like my two pairs, Therefore, can’t that be used to close a strong playing position better than the gap in the number of bets based on a 2:1 ratio.
The short answer is that yes, this is the use of a fold. The game goes on theoretically optimal (GTO) the game requires a fight for the courage to make a decision to increase the stakes by almost 70%. But here we are talking about closing cards that may be above 10-15% of our resistance range to get to the end of the game. This is a big departure from the GTO game and therefore has the potential to be exploited.
Even so, there is a question that we must ask, namely “So What?” When students come to me with this kind of fear, I advise them to articulate what they are really worried about. Being “represented” or “too weak” are not bad things in and of themselves. Before acting on feelings like this, you need to articulate how this should end with consideration of the harm that will be received. In other words, what do you do when something goes wrong where your opponent takes advantage of your mistake? Suppose that it knows that you are about to close KJ’s card and give up the chance to get his $60. What should he do with that information? The obvious answer is that he has to bluff by raising the stakes more. It can be understood that this time maybe B also needs a “pair” or a “draw” to make a call outside of the position on this “flop”. The most certain is with a draw until the end and even having a pair of cards like As-Queen and Queen-10. This is impossible for B because until the end he does not have a pair at the end of the game.
Making use of the hero’s good cards is tight, the line of reasoning here will require a lot of flops being dropped from no pair and no draw positions, and is meant to make a bluff in the final flow of the game by turning a pair into a bluff on card laying. end by the city. Rather than turning a pair into a bluff, it’s a good spot for that, but it’s not something I’d expect a passive player to recognize or
take advantage of the situation. And the fact is that A’s distance looks weak in fact, making it at least like B would feel the need to turn a pair into a bluff. He may think that a hand like Jack-10 can win in the final show after all the cards have been shown by the dealer and should therefore be checked beforehand.
That is what we see here, even though A’s fold is profitable to take advantage of. Person B does not appear to be playing in a way that will take advantage of A’s mistakes. Thus, this mistake is not a mistake at all but a profitable strategy to take advantage of the failure of Person B who failed to bluff at the end of the game with the appropriate frequency. . When you can identify a particular tendency to exploit those weaknesses, and that’s all that’s going on here. agen judi dominoqq
So is A’s action correct by closing the card? It depends on how confident he is in reading the opponent’s situation. As we said, the gap in the number of bets requires A to call with a frequency of 7x higher. If the original call distance is at least 10-15% of the handle, this is a big deviation from the GTO (Game Theoretical Optimum) strategy, it doesn’t make him wrong. But that didn’t mean that he had to be very confident in reading the situation. Minor deviations from the GTO strategy require only a hunch. But massive deviations like this require assurance that person B will almost never come up with a bluff.
Personally, I’m pretty sure that we won’t see any bluff here. But in any case, even if B isn’t bluffing, He may still be risking a worse hand than King-Jack. Maybe he thought As-King or Queen-Jack were good enough for the value bet. Or maybe he’s afraid that A will bluff and so he makes a blocking bet with a King-10 or Ace-Queen hand. We should consider such a scenario before closing the cards.
It is very difficult for me to name a hand card other than Ace-King or Queen-Jack which is valuable for betting. Given the many possible straights and flushes, it’s far from a 100% chance that a passive player will try to value the bet even if this happens in the final stream, especially for large numbers. And also there must be a fair chance where passive players will repeat the raise that was made in the pre-flop (1 round before the final card is opened by the dealer) with the As-King against the raise made by CO (Cut-off), so from all of that I think the chances of seeing any of these hand cards are rather low.
A blocking bet is also a game I don’t expect from a passive player, and the size of that bet is inconsistent with this explanation. While theoretically, bet blocks can be of any size, they tend to be small, just as the idea of the whole day is to avoid spending too much money at stake.
Again, your level of confidence in the readings and assumptions here should determine how good your reasoning range is. Personally, King-Jack is the card hand I’m limiting myself to. If I had the King-Queen, there was one more round he could value the stakes I lost, and that might have been enough to make him reason.